<\/p>\n
Examples of commonly changed estimates include bad-debt allowance, warranty liability, and depreciation. The amendments also clarify the relationship between accounting policies and accounting estimates by specifying that a company develops an accounting estimate to achieve the objective set out by an accounting policy. Now that we\u2019ve defined accounting policy and accounting estimate, let\u2019s step back and understand why the determination between a change in accounting policy versus a change in accounting estimate matters. The accounting treatment differs based on the type of change; therefore, it is critical to make the proper determination in the type of change. Back to the task at hand, we’re assuming a company had a long-term bonus arrangement for one of its employees, entitling them to $100 at the end of Year 4.<\/p>\n
In fact, evaluating internal controls would be necessary even if the error doesn’t result in a restatement or adjustment to prior period financial statements. A change in accounting principle is the term used when a business selects between different generally accepted accounting principles or changes the method with which a principle is applied. Changes can occur within accounting frameworks for either generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), or international financial reporting standards (IFRS). Changes in the classification of financial statement line items in previously issued financial statements generally do not require restatements, unless the change represents the correction of an error (i.e., a misapplication of GAAP in the prior period). Reclassifications represent changes from one acceptable presentation under GAAP to another acceptable presentation. Entities must disclose the impact of a change in an accounting estimate on the income statement and any related per-share amounts of the current period when the change affects several future periods.<\/p>\n
In this case, the business must disclose a description of that change in estimate whenever it presents the financial statements of the period of change. To muddy the waters a bit, there can be situations where a change in an accounting estimate results from a change in an accounting principle. This stems from either a change in estimate of future benefits of the asset, the pattern of consumption of these benefits, or the information available to the company about the benefits.<\/p>\n
The approach taken can therefore affect both the reported results and trends between periods. Translating that to something a bit more palatable, the company reflects the change in the same period that the change in estimate occurred. Once again, you account for a change in estimate that you can’t separate from the effect of a change in accounting principle as a change in estimate. Likewise, suppose the change in estimate doesn’t have a material effect in the period of change but is reasonably certain to have a material impact in later periods.<\/p>\n